Holding that an adverse credibility finding was not supported by substantial evidence where neither the IJ nor the government lawyer "expressed any doubts" during the hearing about the aspect of the petitioner's story later used to deem him not credible and where he "was not cross-examined about [the relevant] events, [and so] had no reason or opportunity to explain what he meant"
Holding 8 U.S.C. § 1101(B) applicable to "husbands whose marriages would be legally recognized, but for China's coercive family planning policies, and not only to husbands whose marriages are recognized by Chinese authorities"
In Montclair v. Ramsdell, 107 U.S. 147, Otoe County v. Baldwin, 111 U.S. 1, 16, and Ackley School District v. Hall, 113 U.S. 135, we had occasion to consider the same general question, with the same result, in connection with similar provisions in the constitutions of New Jersey, Nebraska and Iowa respectively.
Holding that the State Farm holding applies only to "settled" rules and that the January 29, 1990 interim rule was not a settled rule when it was revoked
8 U.S.C. § 1101 Cited 16,782 times 91 Legal Analyses
Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status