In re E----L----H

1 Citing case

  1. Prieto-Romero v. Clark

    534 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 303 times
    Holding that "the Attorney General's statutory authority to detain Prieto–Romero, whose administrative review is complete but whose removal is stayed pending the court of appeals' resolution of his petition for review, must be grounded in § 1226"

    See, e.g., In re A-H-, 23 I. N. Dec. 774 (BIA 2005) (five years); In re Luviano-Rodriguez, 23 I. N. Dec. 718 (BIA 2005) (nine years); In re Marroquin-Garcia, 23 I. N. Dec. 705 (BIA 2005) (eight years); In re E-L-H-, 23 I. N. Dec. 700 (BIA 2004) (seven years); In re C-Y-Z-, 23 I. N. Dec. 693 (BIA 2004) (seven years and review denied). Understandably, the government's assertion that review would end "someday" was little real comfort. Nadarajah, 443 F.3d at 1081.