§
In re E-F-N-

11 Cited authorities

  1. Kansas v. Ventris

    556 U.S. 586 (2009)   Cited 251 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that testimony elicited in violation of Sixth Amendment is admissible to impeach

  2. Mei Chai Ye v. United States Department of Justice

    489 F.3d 517 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 182 times
    Holding reviewing court can refer to IJ's determination that "striking inter-proceeding similarities are ... evidence of a ‘canned’ story" when IJ scrupulously abides by procedural safeguards

  3. Avelar-Oliva v. Barr

    954 F.3d 757 (5th Cir. 2020)   Cited 121 times
    Affirming adverse credibility determination due to variances between credible fear interview and testimony

  4. Chun v. I.N.S.

    40 F.3d 76 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 247 times
    Holding this court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the BIA with respect to the credibility of a witness or ultimate factual findings based on credibility determinations

  5. Arulnanthy v. Garland

    17 F.4th 586 (5th Cir. 2021)   Cited 105 times
    In Arulnanthy, the IJ did not consider the country condition reports submitted by the petitioner and denied CAT relief based only on the petitioner's lack of credibility.

  6. Santos-Alvarado v. Barr

    967 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 2020)   Cited 44 times

    No. 19-60432 07-21-2020 Kevin Noe SANTOS-ALVARADO, also known as Alvarado Kevin Santos, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. Ruben Tyler Kendrick, Perkins Coie, L.L.P., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Andrew Nathan O'Malley, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kimberly Ann Burdge, Esq., Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent. JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge Ruben Tyler Kendrick

  7. Suate-Orellana v. Barr

    979 F.3d 1056 (5th Cir. 2020)   Cited 30 times

    No. 19-60729 11-03-2020 Ninonska SUATE-ORELLANA, also known as Ninoska Suate-Orellana, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. Naomi Sunshine, Washington Square Legal Services, Immigrant Rights Clinic, New York, NY, for Petitioner. Kathryn M. McKinney, Arthur Rabin, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Edith H. Jones, Circuit Judge Naomi Sunshine, Washington Square Legal Services, Immigrant Rights

  8. Radojkovic v. Holder

    599 F. App'x 646 (9th Cir. 2015)

    No. 11-72335 03-24-2015 DEJAN RADOJKOVIC, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. NOT FOR PUBLICATION Agency No. A028-211-730 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted February 10, 2015 San Francisco California Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TASHIMA and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Dejan Radojkovic, a

  9. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,723 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  10. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,997 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver

  11. Rule 613 - Witness's Prior Statement

    Fed. R. Evid. 613   Cited 814 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing the procedure for admitting extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement