§

In re Cervantes-Torres

21 I&N Dec. 351 (B.I.A. 1996)
In re Cervantes-Torres

15 Cited authorities

  1. Segura v. United States

    468 U.S. 796 (1984)   Cited 1,691 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that suppression was not required when officers illegally entered a residence because the officers did not use any information obtained from the illegal entry to secure a warrant

  2. INS v. Lopez-Mendoza

    468 U.S. 1032 (1984)   Cited 991 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "deportation is not to punish past transgressions but rather to put an end to a continuing violation of the immigration laws."

  3. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  4. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 249 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  5. Rosenberg v. Fleuti

    374 U.S. 449 (1963)   Cited 241 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"

  6. Orhorhaghe v. I.N.S.

    38 F.3d 488 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 135 times
    Holding that INS investigators violated an alien's Fourth Amendment rights by detaining him for questioning about his immigration status and by conducting a warrantless search of his home without having obtained voluntary consent

  7. U.S. v. Guzman-Bruno

    27 F.3d 420 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 112 times
    Holding that a defendant's identity cannot be suppressed

  8. Murphy v. I.N.S.

    54 F.3d 605 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 43 times
    Holding the 1-213 form inadmissible as unreliable because alien disputed content and provided specific evidence to the contrary

  9. Castrejon-Garcia v. I.N.S.

    60 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that the BIA's order reversing the grant of suspension and remanding to the IJ for a determination of voluntary departure was a final order of removal because “there was nothing pending before the Board and the petitioner had no reason or basis for appealing the Immigration Judge's decision in his favor”

  10. Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. Immigration Natur

    640 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that an attorney's decision to admit his clients' immigration status and forego a motion to suppress was made to focus attention on a labor law defense and therefore not ineffective assistance, so the aliens could be bound to the admissions

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  12. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  13. Section 1361 - Burden of proof upon alien

    8 U.S.C. § 1361   Cited 343 times
    Providing that the burden of proof to show time, place, and manner of entry into the United States shifts to the alien once alienage is established

  14. Section 1160 - Special agricultural workers

    8 U.S.C. § 1160   Cited 245 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Setting procedures for adjustment of status of certain noncitizens

  15. Section 210.4 - Status and benefits

    8 C.F.R. § 210.4   Cited 15 times
    Echoing this language