§

Idaho Concrete Products Co.

122 N.L.R.B. 412 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Idaho Concrete Products Co.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  4. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  5. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  6. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  7. Labor Board v. Mine Workers

    355 U.S. 453 (1958)   Cited 47 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued January 6, 1958. Decided February 3, 1958. The National Labor Relations Board found that an employer had committed an unfair labor practice by assisting a union to defeat the efforts of a rival union to organize the employer's workers, but that the assisted union was not dominated by the employer. It ordered the employer to post certain notices and to withdraw and withhold recognition from the assisted

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wemyss

    212 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. Wemyss, 212 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1954), we declined to approve a Board finding that an employer interfered with and dominated the administration of an in-house committee system.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Parma Water Lifter

    211 F.2d 258 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13770. March 8, 1954. Rehearing Denied April 13, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Edmond F. Rovner, Washington, D.C., Melton Boyd, Attys., N.L.R.B., Seattle, Wash., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent. Before STEPHENS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Proof Co.

    242 F.2d 560 (7th Cir. 1957)   Cited 11 times

    No. 11828. March 27, 1957. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Ross M. Madden, Edward T. Maslanka, Chicago, Ill., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Florian J. Bartosic, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Albert M. Stern, Stern, Milmet Rossier, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before FINNEGAN, LINDLEY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. By its petition, the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement