§

Hub Pharmacy, Inc.

216 N.L.R.B. 69 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Hub Pharmacy, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Sheridan Creations, Inc.

    357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sheridan Creations, Inc., 357 F.2d 245 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1005, 87 S.Ct. 711, 17 L.Ed.2d 544 (1967), the employer contended that its attempted withdrawal from the multi-employer bargaining unit was authorized because three of its four employees desired not to be represented by the union.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Tulsa Sheet Metal Works, Inc.

    367 F.2d 55 (10th Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that where an agreement contains a “savings and severability” clause, the agreement “should not be completely obliterated because some provisions are beyond the legal limits ... unless such illegal provisions permeate the complete contract to such an extent as to affects its enforceability entirely”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Bagel Bakers Council

    434 F.2d 884 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 18 times
    In NLRB v. Bagel Bakers Council, supra, we enforced a decision and order of the Board which found that the employers, Bagel Bakers Council of Greater New York and sixteen of its constituent members, had committed unfair labor practices in violation of the Act by unlawfully locking out members of Bagel Bakers Union Local 338 of the Bakery and Confectionary Workers International Union of America.

  4. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 21 times
    In Detroit Newspaper Publishers Association v. NLRB, 372 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1967), the sole issue was not a union's disclaimer of any further representation of its members, but rather whether "two labor unions had the right to withdraw unilaterally from [a] multi-employer bargaining unit."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Dover Tavern Owners' Association

    412 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 13 times

    No. 17546. Argued May 9, 1969. Decided June 11, 1969. Joseph Yablonski, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Milford Salny, Netcong, N.J., for respondents. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on a petition for enforcement of the