§

Hortencia R. v. Dept. of the Army

EEOC Appeal No. 0120170723 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 9, 2017)
Hortencia R. v. Dept. of the Army

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden

    503 U.S. 318 (1992)   Cited 1,514 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where the statute does not helpfully define the term "employee," courts should apply its established meaning

  2. Carrier Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    768 F.2d 778 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 80 times
    Holding that companies are joint employers when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees-where from the evidence it can be shown that they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.

    550 F. App'x 253 (6th Cir. 2013)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Skanska, a machine operator, Maurice Knox, was directly employed by a subcontractor, C-1, while working at a construction site managed by Skanska.

  4. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,037 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"