§

Horizon Scripted Television, Inc.

28-CA-184635 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 7, 2017)
Horizon Scripted Television, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 656 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

    511 U.S. 571 (1994)   Cited 97 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Board's test is inconsistent with both the statutory language and th[e] Court's precedents"

  5. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Relco Locomotives, Inc.

    734 F.3d 764 (8th Cir. 2013)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that a challenge to the composition of the National Labor Relations Board under the Recess Appointments Clause was not jurisdictional and could be forfeited if not raised to the Board

  8. Graves v. United States

    150 U.S. 118 (1893)   Cited 336 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "missing witness" inference instruction improper absent showing that witness is peculiarly available to party against whom inference is to be drawn

  9. Club Monte Carlo Corporation, v. N.L.R.B

    821 F.2d 354 (6th Cir. 1987)

    Nos. 86-5708, 86-5829. Argued March 19, 1987. Decided June 18, 1987. Richard J. Sable, D'Agostini, McKinnon, Sable, Ruggeri, Sterling Heights, Mich., David Walker (argued), for petitioner, cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., James M. Darby, Christian Schumann, Corrina Metcalf (argued), Bernard Gottfried, Director, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent, cross petitioner. Petition for review from the NLRB. Before ENGEL and GUY, Circuit Judges

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.. v. Alvin J. Bart & Co.

    598 F.2d 1267 (2d Cir. 1979)   Cited 6 times

    No. 500, Docket 78-4115. Argued January 15, 1979. Decided May 21, 1979. Hugh P. Husband, Jr., New York City, for respondent. Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D.C., Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C. (Sandra L. Elligers, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Petition from the National Labor Relations

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,671 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

  12. Rule 103 - Rulings on Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 103   Cited 3,523 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that once a court makes a definitive ruling on the record to either admit or exclude evidence, at or before trial, a party need not renew an objection at trial to preserve any alleged error for appeal

  13. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,311 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting "employees" the right to unionize

  14. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,214 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”