HMY Roomstore, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"
  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
  3. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  4. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  6. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
  7. Shamrock Foods Company v. N.L.R.B

    346 F.3d 1130 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "Wright Line is inapplicable to cases . . . in which the employer has discharged the employee because of alleged misconduct in the course of protected activity"
  8. Molon Motor & Coil Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    965 F.2d 523 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 91-1885, 91-2222. Argued January 9, 1992. Decided June 19, 1992. As Amended July 15, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 27, 1992. John C. Truesdale, Paul J. Spielberg (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Steven L. Gillman (argued), Davi L. Hirsch, Fox Grove, Chicago, Ill., for Molon Motor Coil Corp. Susan

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.
  10. Roseville Dodge, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    882 F.2d 1355 (8th Cir. 1989)   Cited 6 times

    No. 88-5319. Submitted March 14, 1989. Decided August 23, 1989. Rehearing Denied September 11, 1989. David R. Hols, Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner. John Fawley, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. GIBSON and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Roseville Dodge seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board decision holding that two separate work stoppages by an unrepresented