Hattie L. King, Complainant,v.Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 15, 2003
05A30988 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 15, 2003)

05A30988

08-15-2003

Hattie L. King, Complainant, v. Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Hattie L. King v. Department of the Navy

05A30988

August 15, 2003

.

Hattie L. King,

Complainant,

v.

Hansford T. Johnson,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Request No. 05A30988

Appeal No. 01A24630

Agency No. DON-01-57095-021

Hearing No. 120-A1-4526X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Hattie L. King (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider

the decision in Hattie L. King v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal

No. 01A24630 (June 25, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that the

Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

In her underlying complaint, complainant alleged that the agency

discriminated against her under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. Complainant

requested a hearing, which was subsequently denied after she failed

to appear. The Administrative Judge remanded the case to the agency

to issue a decision. Ultimately, the agency issued a decision finding

no discrimination. On appeal, the Commission determined that the AJ

acted within his discretion to remand the case to the agency and that

there was no evidence in the record to prove that unlawful employment

discrimination had occurred.

In her request for reconsideration, complainant reiterates facts

already in the record from the previous case. We remind complainant

that a �request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the

Commission.� Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29

C.F.R. Part 1614, at 9-17 (rev. November 9, 1999). After a review of

complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous decision, and

the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet

the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the

Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A24630

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 15, 2003

__________________

Date