§

G.M. Trimming, Inc.

279 N.L.R.B. 890 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
G.M. Trimming, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc. v. Carpenters Local Union

    464 U.S. 932 (1983)   Cited 209 times
    Critizing Iowa Electric and Ketchikan

  2. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. South Prairie Constr. v. Operating Engineers

    425 U.S. 800 (1976)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that appeals court usurped role of NLRB by reversing Board's legal conclusion and proceeding to decide issue of fact that should be decided by Board in the first instance

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Carpenters Local U #1846 v. Pratt-Farnsworth

    690 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that a § 301 claim for breach of contract may be stated under an alter ego theory where the defendant had not signed the CBA

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.

    711 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 62 times
    Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Lantz

    607 F.2d 290 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 15 times

    No. 78-2399. October 29, 1979. R. Michael Smith, NLRB, Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner; Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief. A. Stevenson Bogue, Nelson, Harding, Yeutter, Leonard Tate, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before HUFSTEDLER and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, District Judge. Senior United States District Judge Robert A. Grant, Northern District of Indiana, sitting by designation.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New Madrid Mfg. Co.

    215 F.2d 908 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    In New Madrid the business was transferred to a new employer, which was held liable for the unfair labor practices committed by its predecessor before closing.

  9. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions