§

Glens Falls Building & Construction Trades Council

350 N.L.R.B. 417 (N.L.R.B. 2007)
Glens Falls Building & Construction Trades Council

9 Cited authorities

  1. Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 U.S. 645 (1982)   Cited 271 times
    Holding that "the Court of Appeals lack[ed] jurisdiction to review objections that were not urged before the Board"

  2. Connell Co. v. Plumbers Steamfitters

    421 U.S. 616 (1975)   Cited 286 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agreement between a union and a nonlabor party, which is wholly-unrelated to any collective-bargaining effort on the part of the union and which operates or threatens to operate as a restraint on trade, may be the basis for a federal antitrust suit

  3. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  4. Shepard v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    459 U.S. 344 (1983)   Cited 44 times
    Concluding that "§ 303 provides a remedy only for violations of § 8(b) of the Act, which, in turn, requires proof of coercion"

  5. Burda v. M. Ecker Co.

    2 F.3d 769 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that we may uphold the judgment of the district court on any basis that finds support in the record

  6. Iron Workers Dist. Council v. N.L.R.B

    913 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    Applying Moore Dry Dock criteria to determine whether picketing on secondary employer's premises is primary or secondary

  7. District Coun. of Carpenters v. Rowley-Schlimgen

    2 F.3d 765 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 10 times

    No. 92-2566. Argued January 22, 1993. Decided August 17, 1993. Matthew R. Robbins (argued), Naomi Eispman, Previant, Goldberg, Uelman, Gratz, Miller Brueggeman, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff-appellant. Jack D. Walker (argued), Dana J. Erlandsen, Melli, Walker, Pease Ruhly, Madison, WI, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Before CUDAHY, POSNER and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Rowley-Schlimgen, Inc. (Rowley) and

  8. General Truck Drivers, Local 957 v. N.L.R.B

    934 F.2d 732 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 11 times
    Holding delivery work did not fit within construction industry proviso

  9. United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 745, Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B.

    73 F.3d 370 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 3 times

    73 F.3d 370 (9th Cir. 1995) UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 745, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 745, AFL-CIO, Respondent. Nos. 93-70895, 93-71038. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit December 19, 1995 Editorial Note: This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported