§

Gephart et al

IPR2020-00321 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 2, 2020)
Gephart et al

4 Cited authorities

  1. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

    880 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2018)   Cited 10 times   8 Legal Analyses

    2017-1239 01-24-2018 ARTHREX, INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ArthroCare Corp., Appellees Anthony P. Cho, Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, P.C., Birmingham, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by David J. Gaskey, Birmingham, MI. Nathan R. Speed, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by Richard Giunta, Boston, MA, Michael N. Rader, New York, NY. Dyk, Circuit Judge. Anthony P. Cho, Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, P.C., Birmingham, MI, argued for appellant.

  2. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 405 times   192 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  3. Section 42.73 - Judgment

    37 C.F.R. § 42.73   Cited 18 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Regarding judgments

  4. Section 42.8 - Mandatory notices

    37 C.F.R. § 42.8   Cited 11 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a party to "[i]dentify each real party-in-interest for the party"