363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,901 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."
Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
Holding that suit under New York law is preempted because it would alter labor-management relationship and "affect the collective bargaining process that lies at the heart of the NLRA"
Finding that a suit to enforce contractual obligations under an expired contract is not a contract under section 301 "because the contract no longer exists"