§

Fry Products, Inc.

110 N.L.R.B. 1000 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Fry Products, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,683 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Tenn. Coach Co.

    191 F.2d 546 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 35 times

    No. 11238. July 9, 1951. Sidney Sherman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Irving M. Herman, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn. (Charles D. Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., on the brief; Anderson Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel), for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Indus. Cotton Mills

    208 F.2d 87 (4th Cir. 1953)   Cited 21 times

    No. 6635. Argued October 20, 1953. Decided November 9, 1953. Bernard Dunau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Lewis C. Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and WILKIN, District Judge. DOBIE, Circuit Judge

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Fred P. Weissman

    170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948) and N.L.R.B. v. Tempest Shirt Mfg. Co., 285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960), the ownership of the successor was substantially the same as that of the predecessor.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys