§
Exxon Co., USA

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 994 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  2. Vance v. Terrazas

    444 U.S. 252 (1980)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that intent to relinquish citizenship must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence

  3. Bastian-Blessing, Division of Golconda Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    474 F.2d 49 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 17 times
    Ruling that "[h]ealth insurance benefits clearly represent mandatory subjects for bargaining" and holding that the company's unilateral change in insurance providers was a "change in conditions of employment" under the NLRA because the record revealed that the new plan did not offer the same levels of coverage as the previous plan

  4. Keystone Steel Wire, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    606 F.2d 171 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times
    Setting out a case-by-case approach to determine whether a change in retirement, pension, or health-care benefits materially or significantly affected wages or other conditions of employment under the NLRA and holding that a switch in healthcare plan administrators resulted in other changes that had a material and significant impact of "the terms and conditions of employment"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Clement-Blythe Companies

    415 F.2d 78 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 9 times
    In NLRB v. Clement-Blythe Companies, 415 F.2d 78, 81 (4 Cir. 1969), we held that this provision required the board to state its reasons for deciding that an employer had committed an unfair labor practice.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Communications Wkrs. of Amer

    474 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 4 times

    No. 69, Docket 72-1298. Argued October 17, 1972. Decided December 21, 1972. Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Eugene D. Ulterino, Rochester, N.Y. (Nixon, Hargrave, Devans Doyle, Rochester, N.Y., on brief), for intervenor. Richard Lipsitz, Buffalo, N.Y. (Lawrence A. Schulz and Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Schuller James, Buffalo

  7. New York District Council No. 9, International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    453 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 228, 229, Dockets 71-1272, 71-1560. Argued November 16, 1971. Decided December 27, 1971. Henry J. Easton, New York City (Easton Echtman, New York City), for petitioner. Eugene B. Granof, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frank Vogl, Atty., N.L.R.B.), for respondent. Fred P. Ellison, New York City (French, Fink, Markle McCallion, New York City), for intervenor. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MOORE