489 U.S. 141 (1989) Cited 576 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state law prohibiting people from copying unpatentable boat hull designs was preempted because it sought to provide patent-like protection to boat designs not protectable by patent laws and it "contravenes the ultimate goal of public disclosure and use that is the centerpiece of federal patent policy"
Holding that defendant's trade dress was not likely to be confused with that of plaintiff because of conspicuous placement on accused dress of defendant's identifying marks
Noting that in determining whether a design is functional, considerations include "whether there are any concomitant utility patents" and "whether the advertising touts particular features of the design as having specific utility."