No. 2011–1465. Reexamination Nos. 90/007,839 90/007,936 90/007,942 90/007,957 90/009,261. 2012-07-27 In re ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION. Thomas A. Lewry, Brooks Kushman, P.C., of Southfield, Michigan, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Thomas W. Cunningham. William Lamarca, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and Robert J. McManus, Associate Solicitor. LOURIE

Patent Appeal No. 77-509. October 13, 1977. Richard G. Miller, New York City, attorney of record, for appellants, James C. Arvantes, Arlington, Va., of counsel. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents, Gerald H. Bjorge, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals. Before MARKEY, C.J., RICH, BALDWIN and LANE, JJ., and FORD, J., United States Customs Court. MARKEY, Chief Judge. Appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark

Patent Appeal No. 6988. June 28, 1963. Lewis D. Konigsford, Chicago, Ill. (Max Wall, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C. (Jack E. Armore, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH, and ALMOND, Jr., Associate Judges. WORLEY, Chief Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals which rejected claims 1, 11-13, 16, 18, 19, 21 and 22 of appellant's application entitled

Patent Appeal No. 4572. March 23, 1942. Appeal from the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, Serial No. 134,814. Proceeding in the matter of the application of Bert H. Lincoln and another for a patent. From a decision affirming a decision of the primary examiner rejecting their claims, applicants appeal. Affirmed. Thomas E. Scofield, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant. W.W. Cochran, of Washington, D.C. (E.L. Reynolds, of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Patent Appeal No. 5261. March 25, 1947. Appeal from Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, Serial No. 148,978. Proceeding in the matter of the application of Karl Korpi and Arthur R. Goldsby for a patent relating to new and useful improvements in the alkylation of hydrocarbons. From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the primary examiner rejecting claim 65, the applicants appeal. Affirmed. W.P. Epperson, of New York City (Daniel Stryker

(a) PATENT APPLICANT.-An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) PATENT OWNER.-A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. 35 U.S.C. § 134 July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98-622