Ex Parte 7072190 et al

6 Cited authorities

  1. In re Constr. Equip. Co.

    665 F.3d 1254 (Fed. Cir. 2011)   Cited 9 times

    No. 2010–1507.Reexamination No. 90/008,447. 2011-12-15 In re CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT COMPANY. Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt PC, of Portland, OR, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Devon Zastrow Newman. Frances M. Lynch, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. With her on the brief was Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and Janet A. Gongola, Associate Solicitor. PROST Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt PC,

  2. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,489 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Making affidavits and declarations effectively synonymous
  3. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,537 times   308 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements
  4. Section 1.68 - Declaration in lieu of oath

    37 C.F.R. § 1.68   Cited 6 times

    Any document to be filed in the Patent and Trademark Office and which is required by any law, rule, or other regulation to be under oath may be subscribed to by a written declaration. Such declaration may be used in lieu of the oath otherwise required, if, and only if, the declarant is on the same document, warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both (18 U.S.C. 1001 ) and may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issuing thereon

  5. Section 41.67 - Appellant's brief

    37 C.F.R. § 41.67   Cited 2 times

    (a) (1) Appellant(s) may once, within time limits for filing set forth in § 41.66 , file a brief and serve the brief on all other parties to the proceeding in accordance with § 1.903 of this title. (2) The brief must be signed by the appellant, or the appellant's duly authorized attorney or agent and must be accompanied by the requisite fee set forth in § 41.20(b)(2) . (b) An appellant's appeal shall stand dismissed upon failure of that appellant to file an appellant's brief, accompanied by the requisite

  6. Section 1.985 - Notification of prior or concurrent proceedings in inter partes reexamination

    37 C.F.R. § 1.985   Cited 1 times

    (a) In any inter partes reexamination proceeding, the patent owner shall call the attention of the Office to any prior or concurrent proceedings in which the patent is or was involved, including but not limited to interference or trial before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, reissue, reexamination, or litigation and the results of such proceedings. (b) Notwithstanding any provision of the rules, any person at any time may file a paper in an inter partes reexamination proceeding notifying the Office