Evans Products Co.

5 Cited authorities

Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bulletin Co.
443 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1971) Cited 9 times
No. 19058. Argued April 22, 1971. Decided June 11, 1971. Charles R. Both, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Abigail Cooley Baskir, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Kleeb, Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa. (Peter D. Walther, Mark S. Dichter, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent, Bulletin Co. Bernard N. Katz, Meranze, Katz, Spear and Bielitsky
Journeymen Plasterers' Pro. Soc. v. N.L.R.B
341 F.2d 539 (7th Cir. 1965) Cited 8 times
In Journeymen Plasterers' the court found that the circumstances justified a finding of sufficient surprise to permit impeachment of the witness by the use of his extrajudicial statement.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Fred P. Weissman
170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 15 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948) and N.L.R.B. v. Tempest Shirt Mfg. Co., 285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960), the ownership of the successor was substantially the same as that of the predecessor.
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Evans Products Co.

5 Cited authorities

Machinists Local v. Labor Board

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bulletin Co.

Journeymen Plasterers' Pro. Soc. v. N.L.R.B

In Journeymen Plasterers' the court found that the circumstances justified a finding of sufficient surprise to permit impeachment of the witness by the use of his extrajudicial statement.

National Labor Rel. Board v. Fred P. Weissman

In N.L.R.B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948) and N.L.R.B. v. Tempest Shirt Mfg. Co., 285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960), the ownership of the successor was substantially the same as that of the predecessor.

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"