Electrical Workers Local Union No. 73

9 Cited authorities

  1. Giboney v. Empire Storage Co.

    336 U.S. 490 (1949)   Cited 696 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that speech integral to criminal conduct is not protected
  2. United States v. Hutcheson

    312 U.S. 219 (1941)   Cited 382 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jurisdictional dispute between two unions is a labor dispute
  3. Hughes v. Superior Court

    339 U.S. 460 (1950)   Cited 285 times
    In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
  4. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
  5. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that ยง 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."
  6. Labor Board v. Virginia Power Co.

    314 U.S. 469 (1941)   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Virginia Electric Power Co., 314 U.S. 469, 477, 62 S.Ct. 344, 348, 86 L.Ed. 348 (1941), the Supreme court concluded that the Wagner Act could not be interpreted to prohibit an employer from exercising his First Amendment right to express his views to employees on the merits of unionization, provided the expression was neither coercive nor part of a coercive course of conduct.
  7. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Walt Disney Prod

    146 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1945)   Cited 27 times

    No. 10603. December 5, 1944. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1945. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order against Walt Disney Productions. Order modified and enforced. Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, and David Finding and Charles Ryan, Attys., N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gunther R. Lessing, O'Melveney Myers

  8. Drivers, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B

    274 F.2d 551 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 7 times

    No. 14347. Argued October 7, 1958. Decided November 26, 1958. Certiorari Granted April 20, 1959. See 79 S.Ct. 876. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Messrs. Martin F. O'Donoghue and Thomas X. Dunn, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for petitioner. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, National

  9. Alpert v. Excavating Bldg. Material Chauffeurs

    184 F. Supp. 558 (D. Mass. 1960)   Cited 5 times
    In Alpert v. Excavating Building Material Chauffeurs, etc., 184 F. Supp. 558 (D.Mass. 1960), Judge Wyzanski held that Section 158(b)(4)(ii)(B) was not violated by the action of a union official in advising a secondary employer that its agreement with the union prevented it from doing business with the primary employer.