Electrical Contractors, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  2. Indiana Cal-Pro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 1292 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that the NLRB possessed substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that a supervisor violated § 158 when he told employees that he heard from ownership that unionization would lead to the owners shutting down the plant
  3. Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    912 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification
  4. N.L.R.B. v. American Linen Supply Co.

    945 F.2d 1428 (8th Cir. 1991)   Cited 12 times

    No. 90-1467. Submitted December 13, 1990. Decided October 4, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 4, 1991. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., argued (Jerry M. Hunter, Robert E. Allen and Aileen A. Armstrong, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. William Harding, Lincoln, Neb., argued (Jack L. Shultz and Jerry L. Pigsley, Lincoln, Neb., and Cecil R. Hedger, Denver, Colo., on brief), for respondent. Petition for enforcement of order from National Labor Relations Board. Before