18 Cited authorities
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 timesRequiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Labor Board v. Crompton Mills
337 U.S. 217 (1949) Cited 102 timesHolding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware
198 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1952) Cited 43 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc., 198 F.2d 645, this Court granted an order of enforcement similar to one in the case now before us. The Board's Supplemental Decision and Order for the payment of back wages was enforced in that case by this Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Incorporated, reported at 228 F.2d 871.
Republic Steel Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939) Cited 59 timesIn Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939), modified on other grounds, 311 U.S. 7, 61 S.Ct. 77, 85 L.Ed. 6 (1940), this court stated that Congress must have contemplated that the protection of the National Labor Relations Act would extend to employees who commit minor acts of misconduct while exercising their right to strike.
Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950) Cited 36 timesNo. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Union
194 F.2d 698 (7th Cir. 1952) Cited 31 timesIgnoring of prior action before a Wisconsin state agency
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brown Root, Inc
203 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1953) Cited 29 timesNo. 14680. March 24, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen., Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (William A. Brown and Powell, Wirtz Rauhut, Austin, Tex., on the brief) for respondent Ozark Dam Constructors. Ben H.
Olin Industries v. National Labor Rel. Board
191 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1951) Cited 26 timesNo. 13275. August 7, 1951. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass., Gordon Epstein, Maurice Epstein and Allan Seserman, all of Boston, Mass., Samuel Leiter, Chelsea, Mass., of counsel, for petitioner. George J. Bott, Frederick U. Reel, Atty. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, and Maurice Alexandre, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here upon petition
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG
118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941) Cited 39 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 118 F.2d 874, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 595, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1549, it was held that an employer's insistence on a provision in a contract with a bargaining agent, that during the period of the contract or at any future time the employees and the union would not request or demand a closed shop agreement or check-off system, warranted the National Labor Relations Board in inferring that the employer was not actuated by a genuine desire to reach an accord with the bargaining representative.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Longview Fur. Co.
206 F.2d 274 (4th Cir. 1953) Cited 20 timesDescribing the disruptive effect of a court order that forces an employer to reinstate an employee who has "use[d] profane and indecent language"