ECHOSTAR Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
Wieman v. Updegraff
344 U.S. 183 (1952) Cited 630 times
Holding that State cannot require employees to establish their loyalty by extracting oath denying past affiliation with Communist Party
Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 556 (1978) Cited 196 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 24 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 17 times 2 Legal Analyses
Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor Relations
253 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 20 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity
Double Eagle Hotel Casino v. N.L.R.B
414 F.3d 1249 (10th Cir. 2005) Cited 10 times
Sustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center
916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990) Cited 17 times
Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

ECHOSTAR Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Holding that State cannot require employees to establish their loyalty by extracting oath denying past affiliation with Communist Party

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity

Sustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information

Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”