§

Easter Seals Connecticut, Inc.

345 N.L.R.B. 836 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Easter Seals Connecticut, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Honor v. Booz-Allen Hamilton, Inc.

    383 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. 2004)   Cited 389 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that being excluded from meetings and emails was not an adverse employment action

  2. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  3. Paroline v. Unisys Corp.

    879 F.2d 100 (4th Cir. 1989)   Cited 347 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a fact finder could reasonably conclude" employer's remedial action "was inadequate under the circumstances," despite the fact that plaintiff had not made any additional complaints of harassment

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Tradesmen Intern., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    275 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 21 times
    Assuming union organizer's activity constituted "concerted activity" under 29 U.S.C. § 157 but holding it was not protected under statute

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.

    262 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the Board's holding that an employee engaged in concerted activity when he made statements about the company's new break policy at an employee meeting called by the employer to address the policy

  7. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Houston Distribution Serv., Inc.

    573 F.2d 260 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 14 times
    Reviewing ALJ's evaluation of a witness's competency to testify in a hearing under Fed.R.Evid. 601

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Comgeneral Corp.

    684 F.2d 367 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times

    No. 81-1308. Argued May 21, 1982. Decided July 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Daniel Pollitt, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsels, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Thomas M. Green, Green Green, Dayton, Ohio, for respondent. Before ENGEL and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and WEICK, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., for enforcement of its order of August

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baldwin L. Works

    128 F.2d 39 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 60 times
    Modifying and enforced an order by the Board