Dwight T. Chatmon, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 29, 2008
0120081763 (E.E.O.C. May. 29, 2008)

0120081763

05-29-2008

Dwight T. Chatmon, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Dwight T. Chatmon,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120081763

Agency No. 1C441008906

Hearing No. 532200700065X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's February 22, 2008 final order concerning

his equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

At the time of the events at issue, complainant was employed as a

Supervisor of Maintenance Operations, EAS-17, at the post office in

Cleveland, Ohio. Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated

against him on the bases of race (African American) and reprisal for

prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964 when, in September 2006, upon his return from medical leave,

he was returned to his permanent position of first-line supervisor of

maintenance, from a higher-level assignment as maintenance engineering

specialist (EAS-19). Complainant stated that he received the higher-level

detail in February 2006 as a settlement of a prior informal EEO complaint

that he had filed in December 2005.

After complainant's allegations of discrimination were investigated by the

agency, he requested a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ).

Following a hearing held on December 12, 2007, the AJ issued a decision

in favor of the agency, finding that agency management articulated

legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its actions. Specifically,

the AJ credited management's testimony that the higher-level detail was

temporary, complainant's assignment on the detail was completed, and that

other named employees were also returned to their permanent assignments

around the same time to provide stability in the unit and higher-level

acting opportunities to other employees (including a number of African

American employees). The AJ further found that complainant failed to

prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the agency's explanation

for its actions was a pretext for race discrimination or unlawful

retaliation. On February 22, 2008, the agency issued its final order,

fully implementing the AJ's decision. The instant appeal followed.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the final agency order because

the Administrative Judge's ultimate finding, that unlawful employment

discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, is

supported by the record.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must

be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 29, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120081763

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120081763