§

Du-Tri Displays, Inc.

231 N.L.R.B. 1261 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Du-Tri Displays, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. Industrial Union Dept., Afl-Cio v. Hodgson

    499 F.2d 467 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 111 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that substantial evidence standard of review in a legislative-type proceeding is only applicable to some dimensions of the agency's decision

  3. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    544 F.2d 320 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board's refusal to defer on ground that award would violate employee's § 7 rights.

  4. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Ben Pekin Corp.

    452 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 30 times

    No. 18894. October 4, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet Skaare Morris, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Harold A. Katz, Irving M. Friedman, Charles Barnhill, Jr., Zenia S. Goodman, Chicago, Ill., Katz Friedman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and KERNER and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This application by the

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Symons Manufacturing Co.

    328 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 14305. March 4, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Michael N. Sohn, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John Harrington and Albert J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY and KNOCH, Circuit Judges, and MERCER, District Judge. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Cent. Okla. Milk Producers Ass'n

    285 F.2d 495 (10th Cir. 1960)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting enforcement of N.L.R.B. order finding milk tank-truck drivers entitled to overtime under FLSA where drivers were employed by separate trucking entity owned by dairy association

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Tom Wood Pontiac, Inc.

    447 F.2d 383 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 12 times
    Usurping union's role in grievance procedure

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Dennison Manufacturing Company

    419 F.2d 1080 (1st Cir. 1970)   Cited 7 times

    No. 7304. December 10, 1969. Rehearing Denied January 12, 1970. Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970. See 90 S.Ct. 1264. Baruch A. Fellner, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., Attorney, were on brief, for petitioner. Louis Chandler, Boston, Mass., with whom Alan S. Miller and Stoneman Chandler, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for Dennison Mfg

  10. Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14566. October 7, 1964. Fredric N. Richman, Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George H. Cohen, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Seymour Strongin, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by Nachman Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations

  11. Section 651 - Congressional statement of findings and declaration of purpose and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 651   Cited 1,500 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Noting the OSH Act arose from concern surrounding "personal injuries and illnesses arising out of work situations"

  12. Section 671 - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

    29 U.S.C. § 671   Cited 32 times
    Establishing agency