Double A Products Co.

12 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sharples Chemicals
209 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1954) Cited 44 times
In NLRB v. Sharples Chemicals, Inc., 209 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1954), the respondent had submitted 53 proposed findings to the NLRB. Of such findings 20 were accepted by the Board and remainder rejected.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McCatron
216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 25 times
In N.L.R.B. v. McCatron, 216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 1955, 348 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 365, 99 L.Ed. 738, strikers acted in the good faith but mistaken belief that a fellow employee, whose reinstatement they sought, had been discharged because of union activities.
Pacemaker Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
260 F.2d 880 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 16 times
No. 12344. November 13, 1958. Larry S. Davidow, Davidow Davidow, Detroit, Mich., Al. J. Spahn, Elkhart, Ind., for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., James C. Paras, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and HASTINGS and KNOCH, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Chief Judge
Old King Cole v. National Labor Relations Bd.
260 F.2d 530 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 13 times
Filing petition for review of an order of the Labor Board does not operate as a stay of the Board's order, consistent with Section 10(g) of the NLRA
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wemyss
212 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 17 times
In NLRB v. Wemyss, 212 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1954), we declined to approve a Board finding that an employer interfered with and dominated the administration of an in-house committee system.
N.L.R.B. v. Mt. Clemens Metal Products Company
287 F.2d 790 (6th Cir. 1961) Cited 10 times
No. 14263. March 21, 1961. Richard H. Frank, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Desenberg, Detroit, Mich. (Moll, Desenberg, Purdy Glover, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before MILLER, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and THORNTON, District Judge. SHACKELFORD MILLER, JR., Chief Judge
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shedd-Brown MFG
213 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1954) Cited 14 times
No. 11031. May 17, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 17, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Clarence A. Meter, Arnold Ordman, Duane Beeson, and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald O. Wright, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court
N.L.R.B. v. Cadillac Wire Corp.
290 F.2d 261 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 4 times
No. 309, Docket 26688. Argued April 12, 1961. Decided May 10, 1961. Glen M. Bendixsen, Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Sol E. King, New York City, for the Cadillac Corporation. Harry Weinstock, Henry Brickman, New York City, Weinstock Tauber, New York City, of counsel, for the Union. Before FRIENDLY, HAND and
N.L.R.B. v. the Summers Fertilizer
251 F.2d 514 (1st Cir. 1958) Cited 5 times
No. 5253. Heard November 6, 1957. Decided January 14, 1958. Robert J. Wilson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Herbert H. Bennett, Portland, Me., with whom Mayo S. Levenson, Portland, Me., was on the brief, for respondents. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN
National Labor Rel. Board v. Assoc. Machines
239 F.2d 858 (6th Cir. 1956)
No. 12841. December 26, 1956. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., and Charles M. Ryan, Regional Director, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Probst, Gallucci O'Malley, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The oral arguments, briefs, and the entire record have been heard and considered on this petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order; And it appearing that there is substantial evidence
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Double A Products Co.

12 Cited authorities

In NLRB v. Sharples Chemicals, Inc., 209 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1954), the respondent had submitted 53 proposed findings to the NLRB. Of such findings 20 were accepted by the Board and remainder rejected.

In N.L.R.B. v. McCatron, 216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 1955, 348 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 365, 99 L.Ed. 738, strikers acted in the good faith but mistaken belief that a fellow employee, whose reinstatement they sought, had been discharged because of union activities.

Filing petition for review of an order of the Labor Board does not operate as a stay of the Board's order, consistent with Section 10(g) of the NLRA

In NLRB v. Wemyss, 212 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1954), we declined to approve a Board finding that an employer interfered with and dominated the administration of an in-house committee system.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"