§

Diverse Steel, Inc.

26-CA-020799 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 21, 2003)
Diverse Steel, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 327 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Penntech Papers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    706 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure

  3. C.E.K Indus Mechanical Contractors v. N.L.R.B

    921 F.2d 350 (1st Cir. 1990)   Cited 57 times
    Adopting Deklewa “as the law in this circuit”

  4. J. M. Tanaka Const., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    675 F.2d 1029 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that common ownership is but one factor to be considered by the Board and it "is not a necessary prerequisite to an alter ego finding."

  5. Int. U. of Operating Eng. v. N.L.R.B

    518 F.2d 1040 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 50 times
    Finding the common management prong satisfied by several interchanges of higher-level managers and officers between the corporations

  6. Vance v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    71 F.3d 486 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 17 times
    Finding a single employer where interrelation of operations, common ownership, or centralized control of labor relations are present

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Welcome-American Fertilizer Company

    443 F.2d 19 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that no one of the enumerated factors is controlling

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second