§

Delchamps, Inc.

330 N.L.R.B. 1310 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Delchamps, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Birch Run Welding Fabricating, v. N.L.R.B

    761 F.2d 1175 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 35 times
    Ordering general layoffs to discourage or retaliate against union activity is unlawful discrimination, even though some employees opposed to the union were laid-off as well

  3. Ballou Brick Co. v. N.L.R.B

    798 F.2d 339 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 14 times
    Modifying statement sufficient to render an otherwise invalid statement valid was made two weeks before the start of the union campaign, was announced in affirmative terms, and there was "no evidence that the employees did not know of the rule change"

  4. Merchants Truck Line, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    577 F.2d 1011 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 21 times

    No. 77-3043. August 7, 1978. Leslie Darden, New Albany, Miss., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc., Gen. Counsel, Alan Banov, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG

  5. M. S. P. Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    568 F.2d 166 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 17 times

    No. 76-1100. Argued and Submitted November 18, 1976. Decided December 23, 1977. James E. Hautzinger, Denver, Colo. (Charles W. Newcom of Dawson, Nagel, Sherman Howard, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for petitioner. Andrew F. Tranovich, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Peggy A. Hillman

  6. Delchamps, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    585 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 11 times
    In Delchamps, however, the NLRB attempted to impute knowledge from the supervisors at a satellite grocery store to an area supervisor who ordered the suspension of an employee based on a customer compliant.

  7. Dillingham Marine Mfg. Co., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    610 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times

    No. 79-1029. January 24, 1980. Threadgill Smith, Taylor B. Smith, Columbus, Miss., for petitioner cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Edward S. Dorsey, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent cross-petitioner. On Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before AINSWORTH, VANCE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. R. LANIER ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This case comes before us for review of the Decision

  8. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,662 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party