§

David/Randall Associates, Inc.

No. 76258134 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 12, 2003)
David/Randall Associates, Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Application of Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).

  2. Planters Nut Chocolate Co. v. Crown Nut

    305 F.2d 916 (C.C.P.A. 1962)   Cited 12 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6812. August 15, 1962. Mason, Fenwick Lawrence, Boynton P. Livingston, Washington, D.C. (G. Cabell Busick, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Robert K. Youtie, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. United States Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place of Judge O'CONNELL, pursuant to provisions of Section 294(d), Title

  3. Section 2 - Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty

    15 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 4,473 times   31 Legal Analyses
    In § 2 cases under the Sherman Act, as in § 7 cases under the Clayton Act (Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325) there may be submarkets that are separate economic entities.