David A. Holland, Complainant,v.Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 15, 2013
0520130172 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 15, 2013)

0520130172

03-15-2013

David A. Holland, Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


David A. Holland,

Complainant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Request No. 0520130172

Appeal No. 0120121683

Agency No. 200PVI222011104707

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in David A. Holland v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121683 (October 23, 2012). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In the appellate decision, Complainant alleged he was discriminated against on the basis of race, color, sex, disability and age when he, in September/October 2009, received notification informing him that he was not selected for the position of Prosthetics Representative, Vacancy Announcement number 09-0949 (RC). The Agency dismissed the complaint for failure to contact an EEO Counselor within 45 days of the incident. The record reveals that Complainant contacted the EEO Counselor on September 2, 2011. Complainant appealed the Agency's dismissal to the Commission. In Holland v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121683, the Commission reversed the Agency's dismissal noting that the Agency failed to offer sufficient evidence to support a reasoned determination as to timeliness. The Agency requests that the Commission reconsider its appellate decision.

In support of the Agency's request for reconsideration, the Agency argues that the appellate decision contained an erroneous interpretation of material fact. Specifically, the Agency argues that it provided the Commission with a copy of training materials that include notice of the 45-day requirement to contact an EEO Counselor. The Agency contends that Complainant received these materials.

We remind the Agency that a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission." Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17. A reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Here, we find that the Agency has not met its burden. The Agency misunderstands its burden to establish that Complainant's EEO Counselor contact was untimely. Significantly, we note that although the Agency asserts that records show that Complainant received the training documents, there was no such evidence in the record presented to the Commission at the time the previous decision was issued. This bare assertion, without more, is not sufficient to show that Complainant had constructive knowledge of the 45-day time period. Further, there is no other evidence in the record that Complainant had constructive knowledge of the requisite time frames. Accordingly, we find that the Agency did not establish that the appellate decision clearly err in its interpretation of facts or law.

After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120121683 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. The Agency will comply with the previous decision's Order which is restated below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney

with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__3/15/13________________

Date

2

0520130172

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0520130172