§

Dan River Mills, Inc.

121 N.L.R.B. 645 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Dan River Mills, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Stow Manufacturing Co.

    217 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 31 times

    No. 74, Docket 23104. Argued October 6, 1954. Decided December 7, 1954. Fannie M. Boyls, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jean Engstrom, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. George C. Coughlin, Harrison, Coughlin, Dermody Ingalls, Binghamton, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges. L. HAND,

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. West Point Mfg. Co.

    245 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. West Point Mfg. Co., 245 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1957), and N.L.R.B. v. Williams, 195 F.2d 669 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 834, 73 S.Ct. 42, 97 L.Ed. 649 (1952), it was held that coercive interrogation of employees by Company officials constitutes a violation of the Act.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S.E. Rubber MFG

    213 F.2d 11 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 13 times

    No. 14851. May 20, 1954. Rehearing Denied June 4, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., William M. Pate, Chief Law Officer, NL RB, Atlanta, Ga., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose, Alice Andrews, Washington, D.C., Attys. for petitioner. John Wesley Weekes, Decatur, Ga., Abit Nix, Athens, Ga., for respondent. Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions

  5. Brewery Bev. Drivers, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    257 F.2d 194 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13883. Argued February 3, 1958. Decided May 1, 1958. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas X. Dunn and Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Owsley Vose, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before PRETTYMAN, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges. WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge. The Brewery

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston

    193 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 9 times

    No. 13457. December 28, 1951. Rehearing Denied January 12, 1952. Joseph A. Jenkins, Atty. NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sam R. Sayers, Fort Worth, Tex., Carl L. Phinney, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and STRUM, Circuit Judges. JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.Page 396 Upon findings that, in violation of Secs. 8(a) (1, 3, 5) of the National Labor