CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 191 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
  3. Pleasantview Nursing Home, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    351 F.3d 747 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that oral modification of a collective bargaining agreement was ineffective in the presence of "an express zipper clause prohibiting modification except by written agreement"
  4. Retlaw Broadcasting Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    172 F.3d 660 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 14 times
    In Retlaw, 172 F.3d at 664, the Union sought access to "personal service contracts" — employment agreements between individuals and Retlaw.
  5. Buckley v. Am. Fed. Television Radio Artists

    496 F.2d 305 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 37 times
    Reminding in dicta that "[t]here is no legal requirement for the press to present a `fair' balance of opinion and analysis. Subject only to the laws of libel, there is not even a requirement of truthfulness and accuracy."
  6. North Bay Dev. Dis. Serv. v. N.L.R.B

    905 F.2d 476 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 8 times

    No. 89-1467. Argued May 15, 1990. Decided June 15, 1990. Michael E. Avakian, North Springfield, Va., for petitioner. Margaret G. Bezou, N.L.R.B., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter Winkler, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. GINSBURG, and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed