Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Labor Board v. Parts Co.

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

Figueroa v. U.S.

Interpreting "reasonable accommodation" under the Rehabilitation Act

Orders v. Stotts

Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"