§

Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. Guantanamera Cigars Company

No. 91152248 (T.T.A.B. Feb. 29, 2008)
Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. Guantanamera Cigars Company

6 Cited authorities

  1. University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.

    703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 19 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.

  2. Daggett Ramsdell v. Procter Gamble

    275 F.2d 955 (C.C.P.A. 1960)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6526. March 15, 1960. Mead, Browne, Schuyler Beveridge, William E. Schuyler, Jr., Andrew B. Beveridge, Washington, D.C. (Francis C. Browne, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant. Allen Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio (Erastus S. Allen, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge FRANCIS L. VAN DUSEN. United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place

  3. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,600 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  4. Section 2.120 - Discovery

    37 C.F.R. § 2.120   Cited 23 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the TTAB "in its discretion, may refuse to consider the additional written disclosures or responses"

  5. Section 2.122 - Matters in evidence

    37 C.F.R. § 2.122   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that in inter partes proceeding, "[t]he allegation in an application for registration, or in a registration, of a date of use is not evidence on behalf of the applicant or registrant" but, rather, "a date of use of a mark must be established by competent evidence"

  6. Section 2.123 - Trial testimony in inter partes cases

    37 C.F.R. § 2.123   Cited 10 times

    (a) (1) The testimony of witnesses in inter partes cases may be submitted in the form of an affidavit or a declaration pursuant to § 2.20 and in conformance with the Federal Rules of Evidence, filed during the proffering party's testimony period, subject to the right of any adverse party to elect to take and bear the expense of oral cross-examination of that witness as provided under paragraph (c) of this section if such witness is within the jurisdiction of the United States, or conduct cross-examination