Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Northeast Area), Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 27, 20130120111464 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 27, 2013) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 , Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Northeast Area), Agency. Appeal No. 0120111464 Agency No. 4A-006-0098-08 DISMISSAL OF APPEAL Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated November 24, 2010, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. For the following reasons, the Commission DISMISSES Complainant’s appeal. On October 27, 2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of disability and age when: 1. On an unspecified date, the Agency "reproach[ed]" Complainant because he did not cooperate regarding a supervisor blackmailing two postmasters; 2. On unspecified date, the Agency falsified and used false information to justify firing Complainant; 3. On unspecified date, the Agency violated Complainant's due process of law; and 4. On an unspecified date, the Agency failed to present documents in the processing of this complaint to Complainant.1 On November 24, 2010, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely filing the complaint. The 1 The Agency noted Complainant did not re-allege all of the issues raised during pre-complaint counseling and found Complainant abandoned these issues in his complaint when he did not re- allege them in his formal complaint. 0120111464 2 Agency noted that the Notice of Right to File a Complaint was received at Complainant’s address of record on March 16, 2010, but that he did not file a formal complaint until October 27, 2010, which was beyond the 15-day time limit. On July 11, 2011, Complainant filed a civil action (identified as Civil Action No. 3:11-cv- 01659-JAF) in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. The record further discloses that the claims raised therein are the same as those raised in the instant complaint. The regulation found at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409 provides that the filing of a civil action "shall terminate Commission processing of the appeal." Commission regulations mandate dismissal of the EEO complaint under these circumstances so as to prevent a Complainant from simultaneously pursuing both administrative and judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting resources, and creating the potential for inconsistent or conflicting decisions, and in order to grant due deference to the authority of the federal district court. See Stromgren v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079 (May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Dep’t of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513 (October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October 25, 1988). Accordingly, the Complainant’s appeal is DISMISSED. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M0610) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any 0120111464 3 supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610) You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610) If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations February 27, 2013 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation