0520150331
08-25-2015
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Complainant,
v.
John M. McHugh,
Secretary,
Department of the Army,
Agency.
Request No. 0520150331
Appeal No. 0120132147
Hearing No. 430-2011-00166X
Agency No. ARBRAGG10MAY02508
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Complainant v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120132147 (March 9, 2015). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).
Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that she was discriminated against based on race concerning her termination and harassment occurring from July 2009 through March 2010. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a decision without a hearing, finding that Complainant was not discriminated against as alleged. The Agency adopted the AJ's findings in a final Action dated January 10, 2013, and on May 6, 2013, Complainant filed an appeal with the Commission.
The previous decision found that Complainant's appeal was untimely filed and dismissed the appeal. The decision found that Complainant initially mailed her appeal, which was dated March 11, 2013, to the wrong mailing address. The appeal letter was returned to Complainant and was not received by the Commission until May 6, 2013.
In her request for reconsideration, Complainant states it was "possible that [she] mixed up the address" and that she was "surprised to see that the address was incorrect" so she drove to Washington, DC to deliver it. She states that the reason it took until May to deliver the letter was because she was not at her residence full time. Complainant's reasons for the delay are insufficient. We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, � VII.A. Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120132147 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests.
Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainants Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
August 25, 2015
__________________
Date
2
0520150331
2
0520150331