Complainant,v.John Kerry, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 3, 2015
0520150342 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 3, 2015)

0520150342

09-03-2015

Complainant, v. John Kerry, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Complainant,

v.

John Kerry,

Secretary,

Department of State,

Agency.

Request No. 0520150342

Appeal No. 0120132689

Agency No. DOSF11611

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120132689 (March 11, 2015). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).

At the time of events giving rise to the underlying complaint, Complainant was an applicant for employment at the Agency. Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency discriminated against him on the bases of race (African American), age, and sex (male) when on May 2, 2011, he was not selected for the position of Personal Service Contractor-Program Analyst, GS-0080-13/13, under vacancy announcement DS-2011-0230.

Complainant initially requested a hearing, but the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Administrative Judge returned the matter to the Agency for issuance of a final Agency decision when Complainant failed to appear for his deposition. Our prior appellate decision affirmed Agency's decision which concluded that Complainant failed to prove his discrimination claims.

In his request for reconsideration, Complainant expresses his disagreement with the previous decision and presents some of the same arguments he raised on appeal. We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, � VII.A. Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.

After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120132689 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests.

Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainants Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 3, 2015

__________________

Date

2

0520150342

2

0520150342