§

Complainant v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

EEOC Appeal No. 0720140037 (E.E.O.C. May. 29, 2015)
Complainant v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Nassar

    570 U.S. 338 (2013)   Cited 5,423 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish but-for causation in a Title VII retaliation claim

  2. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.

    557 U.S. 167 (2009)   Cited 4,602 times   83 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish but-for causation in an ADEA disparate treatment claim

  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  4. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,625 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  5. Gomez-Perez v. Potter

    553 U.S. 474 (2008)   Cited 308 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the statutory phrase 'discrimination based on age' " in § 633a "includes retaliation based on the filing of an age discrimination complaint"

  6. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,026 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"