§

Combined Century Theatres, Inc.

120 N.L.R.B. 1379 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Combined Century Theatres, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Federal Club v. National League

    259 U.S. 200 (1922)   Cited 136 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the business of providing public baseball games for profit between clubs of professional baseball players was not within the scope of federal antitrust laws

  3. Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom

    147 F. Supp. 306 (D.D.C. 1957)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 134-56. January 8, 1957. Brown Gettler, Cincinnati, Ohio, John E. McCarty, Washington, D.C. for plaintiffs. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Arnold Ordman and John E. Jay, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D.C. for defendant. MORRIS, District Judge. Plaintiff Hotel Employees Local No. 255, hereinafter referred to as "Local No. 255," is an affiliate of plaintiff Hotel and Restaurant Employees and

  4. Martin v. National League Baseball Club

    174 F.2d 917 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 9 times
    In Martin v. National League Baseball Club, 174 F.2d 917, 918 (2d Cir. 1949), the Second Circuit, after having held baseball subject to the antitrust laws (after Federal Baseball, but prior to Toolson), nevertheless refused to issue a preliminary injunction on behalf of a player excluded from professional baseball because the question of the legality of the reserve system "may involve consideration, among other things, of the needs and conduct of the business as a whole."