§

Coast Aluminum Co.

120 N.L.R.B. 1326 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Coast Aluminum Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  2. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  3. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  4. Labor Board v. Southern Bell Co.

    319 U.S. 50 (1943)   Cited 42 times
    In Seber, the United States Supreme Court addressed a similar statute which provided that certain Indian lands would be immune from state taxes if two requirements were met: that the title to the lands be held by an Indian subject to restrictions against alienation or encumbrance or approval of the Secretary of the Interior; and the lands were purchased out of trust or restricted funds.

  5. Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.

    315 U.S. 685 (1942)   Cited 39 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid

  6. Joanna Cotton Mills v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    176 F.2d 749 (4th Cir. 1949)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that circulation of a petition by an employee for the removal of a foreman against whom the employee held a personal grudge was not protected activity

  7. Superior Engraving Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    183 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1950)   Cited 44 times
    In Superior Engraving Co. v. National LaborRel. Bd., 183 F.2d 783, 789 (7 Cir. 1950), certiorari denied 340 U.S. 930, 71 S.Ct. 490, 95 L.Ed. 671 (1951), the court recently declined to apply Sohn v. Waterson, supra, to an amendatory provision in the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(b), that "no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. White Construction Engineering Co.

    204 F.2d 950 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times

    No. 14137. June 5, 1953. Rehearing Denied August 14, 1953. Bernard Dunau, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. General Counsel, George J. Bott, General Counsel, and Ruth V. Reel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Tom Watson, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before BORAH, RUSSELL and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued January 17, 1952, requiring respondent to bargain with a named

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brown Root, Inc

    203 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times

    No. 14680. March 24, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen., Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (William A. Brown and Powell, Wirtz Rauhut, Austin, Tex., on the brief) for respondent Ozark Dam Constructors. Ben H.

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gen. Shoe Corp.

    192 F.2d 504 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times
    Holding similar committee to be labor organization