§

Chara S.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Northeast Area), Agency.

0120150821 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 24, 2016)
Chara S.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Northeast Area), Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,755 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"

  2. Tullidge v. Biddle

    4 F.2d 897 (8th Cir. 1925)   Cited 9 times

    No. 6709. April 3, 1925. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas; John C. Pollock, Judge. Petition by Edward K. Tullidge for writ of habeas corpus, to be directed to W.I. Biddle, Warden of the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kan. From an order sustaining a motion to dismiss his petition, petitioner appeals. Order affirmed. R.D. Barker, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant. Alton H. Skinner, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Topeka, Kan. (Al. F. Williams, U.S. Atty

  3. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,833 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  4. Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.110   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”

  5. Section 1614.108 - Investigation of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.108   Cited 183 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Describing inquisitorial nature of investigation process

  6. Section 1614.604 - Filing and computation of time

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.604   Cited 140 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the time limits applicable to the subject regulations "are subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling"

  7. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"