§

CASINO PAUMA

21-CA-103026 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 25, 2014)
CASINO PAUMA

20 Cited authorities

  1. Mich. v. Bay Mills Indian Cmty.

    572 U.S. 782 (2014)   Cited 469 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that tribal immunity extends to "suits arising from a tribe’s commercial activities, even when they take place off Indian lands"

  2. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art

    578 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,315 times
    Holding that a court may take judicial notice of publications to establish what was in the public realm at the time

  3. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Potawatomi Tribe

    498 U.S. 505 (1991)   Cited 640 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states have a right to collect taxes on certain cigarette sales on an Indian reservation, but the tribe is immune from suit seeking to enforce that right

  4. Rivas v. Fischer

    687 F.3d 514 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 539 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that press coverage was sufficient to put the petitioner on notice of the factual predicate for his claim

  5. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  6. Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

    522 U.S. 948 (1997)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula

  7. American Prairie Const. v. Hoich

    560 F.3d 780 (8th Cir. 2009)   Cited 100 times
    Holding that movant seeking judicial disqualification bears a “substantial burden”

  8. McCrary v. Elations Co.

    Case No. EDCV 13-00242 JGB (OPx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2014)   Cited 61 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that class was sufficiently ascertainable because "the class definition clearly define[d] the characteristics of a class member by providing a description of the allegedly offending product and the eligible dates of purchase"

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chapa De Indian Health Program, Inc.

    316 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 25 times
    Determining that the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") was a statute of general applicability despite containing exceptions

  10. San Manuel v. N.L.R.B

    475 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 18 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the Board could reasonably conclude that Congress's decision not to include an express exception for Indian tribes in the NLRA was because no such exception was intended or exists”

  11. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 29,859 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

  12. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,675 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

  13. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 13,040 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities