0120152253
10-22-2015
Carletta W.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Great Lakes Area), Agency.
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Carletta W.,1
Complainant,
v.
Megan J. Brennan,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Great Lakes Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120152253
Agency No. 4J-481-0068-15
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated May 14, 2015, dismissing a formal complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
BACKGROUND
During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a Station Manager at the Agency's College Park Station in Detroit, Michigan.
On May 8, 2015, Complainant filed the instant formal complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior EEO activity when:
1. on December 9, 2014, she was not selected for the EAS-23 CSOM position;
2. on December 23, 2014, she was harassed when she was summoned to the main post office and told to sign a training form on "Scanning Integrity and Dignity and Respect;" and
3. on February 17, 2015, her manager interfered with her ability to run her operation.
In its May 14, 2015 final decision, the Agency dismissed claims 1 and 2 for stating the same claim that was raised in a prior EEO complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). Specifically, the Agency found that instant formal complaint raises the same matter in Agency Case No. 4J-481-0037-15.
Further, the Agency dismissed claim 3 for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).
The instant appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
Same claims (claims 1 and 2)
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides for the dismissal of a complaint that states the same claims that is pending before or has been decided by the Commission or the Agency. The Commission has consistently held that in order form a formal complaint to be dismissed as identical, the elements of the complaint must be identical to the elements of the prior complaint in time, place, incidents, and parties. See Jackson v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 01955890 (April 5, 1996).
The Agency dismissed claims 1 and 2 on the grounds that Complainant raised the same matter in a previously filed EEO complaint (Agency Case No. 4J-481-0037-15). However, the record does not contain a copy of Agency Case No. 4J-481-0037-15. Clearly, it is the burden of the Agency to have proof in support of its decision. See Marshall v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05910685 (September 6, 1991). Therefore, the Agency improperly dismissed claims 1 and 2 on the grounds that it states the same claim that was raised in a previously filed EEO complaint.
Failure to state a claim (claim 3)
The Agency improperly fragmented Complainant's claim of ongoing discriminatory harassment/hostile work environment by dismissing claim 3 for failure to state a claim. A fair reading of claim 3, Complainant claimed that she was subjected to a series of related incidents of harassment when she was not selected for the EAS-23 CSOM position; was issued a proposed Letter of Warning in lieu of a suspension; and Agency management interfered with her ability to run her operation.
As a remedy, Complainant requested the harassment cease, that the Acting Postmaster be removed from his position for harassing her, compensatory damages, and be placed in a CSOM position. These matters, taken together, state an actionable claim of harassment. By alleging a pattern of harassment, Complainant has stated a cognizable claim under the EEOC regulations. See Cervantes v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05930303 (November 12, 1993).
Accordingly, we REVERSE the Agency's dismissal of claims 1 - 2 for stating the same claim and claim 3 for failure to state a claim, defined herein as a harassment claim, and we REMAND this matter to the Agency for further processing in accordance with the ORDER below.
ORDER (E0610)
The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims (harassment/hostile work environment) in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.
A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)
This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
October 22, 2015
__________________
Date
1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0120152253
5
0120151609
6
0120152253