Buonadonna ShopRite LLC

8 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
420 U.S. 251 (1975) Cited 433 times 64 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
Garment Workers v. Quality Mfg. Co.
420 U.S. 276 (1975) Cited 68 times
Holding that because the employer “failed to file a petition for reconsideration as permitted by Board Rules and Regulations,” the employer could not assert its objection on appeal
Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B
652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 97 times
Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
338 F.3d 267 (4th Cir. 2003) Cited 9 times
Noting that "an employee . . . can lose protections if his conduct is so egregious as to take it outside the protection of the Act, or of such a character as to render the employee unfit for further service"
N.L.R.B. v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.
936 F.2d 144 (3d Cir. 1991) Cited 17 times
Nos. 90-3857, 91-3060. Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) June 7, 1991. Decided June 25, 1991. As Amended June 28, 1991. James F. Brady, New Jersey Bell Telephone Co., Newark, N.J., for respondent. Howard E. Perlstein, Richard A. Cohen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ellen Dichner, Gladstein, Reif Meginniss, New York City, for intervenor. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SLOVITER, Chief Judge, and GREENBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Atlanta Nat. Bank
924 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir. 1990) Cited 8 times
Analyzing whether employer's threat to sue employee for defamation violated NLRA
Pacific Tel. Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B
711 F.2d 134 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 8 times
Holding that "once union representation has been afforded, the representative may speak for the employee he represents and either the union representative or the employee may make the request for pre[-]interview conference"
Climax Molybdenum Co. v. N.L.R.B
584 F.2d 360 (10th Cir. 1978) Cited 4 times
Denying enforcement of Board's order where union had a policy of noncooperation pursuant to which union officials, including the official who requested the pre-interview consultation, "had urged [employees] not to cooperate with management in any investigatory interviews"

Buonadonna ShopRite LLC

8 Cited authorities

Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

Holding that because the employer “failed to file a petition for reconsideration as permitted by Board Rules and Regulations,” the employer could not assert its objection on appeal

Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"

Noting that "an employee . . . can lose protections if his conduct is so egregious as to take it outside the protection of the Act, or of such a character as to render the employee unfit for further service"

Analyzing whether employer's threat to sue employee for defamation violated NLRA

Holding that "once union representation has been afforded, the representative may speak for the employee he represents and either the union representative or the employee may make the request for pre[-]interview conference"

Denying enforcement of Board's order where union had a policy of noncooperation pursuant to which union officials, including the official who requested the pre-interview consultation, "had urged [employees] not to cooperate with management in any investigatory interviews"