§

Buffalo Typographical Union 9

202 N.L.R.B. 156 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Buffalo Typographical Union 9

9 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 631 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 872 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  4. Labor Board v. News Syndicate Co.

    365 U.S. 695 (1961)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.

  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 936 (6th Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times

    No. 19875. June 10, 1970. Guy Farmer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner; John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., Nicholas R. Criss, Jr., Hugh M. Finneran, PPG Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief. Nancy M. Sherman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Hoisting Portable Eng., L. No. 4

    456 F.2d 242 (1st Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 71-1333. Heard February 23, 1972. Decided March 9, 1972. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Madge F. Jefferson, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Arthur J. Flamm, Boston, Mass., with whom Flamm, Mason Paven, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  8. Glasser v. N.L.R.B

    395 F.2d 401 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 282-285, Dockets 31910-31913. Argued February 19, 1968. Decided May 13, 1968. Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for petitioners. Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Gregory L. Hellrung, Washington, D.C., Attorney), for respondent. Henry Kaiser, Ronald Rosenberg, George B. Driesen, Washington, D.C., Emanuel Dannett, Jacob Silverman, New York City, for intervenor. Before FRIENDLY

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,095 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"