Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Prill v. N.L.R.B

In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

N.L.R.B. v. Mike Yurosek Son, Inc.

Holding that four employees who protested reduction in hours and then later refused a contradictory order to work longer hours engaged in concerted activity

Prill v. N.L.R.B

Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”