Bernard A. Jocuns, Complainant,v.John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 10, 2003
05A30932 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 10, 2003)

05A30932

09-10-2003

Bernard A. Jocuns, Complainant, v. John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Bernard A. Jocuns v. Department of the Treasury

05A30932

September 10, 2003

.

Bernard A. Jocuns,

Complainant,

v.

John W. Snow,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Request No. 05A30932

Appeal No. 01A20430

Agency No. TD-00-3257

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Bernard A. Jocuns (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the

decision in Bernard A. Jocuns v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal

No. 01A20430 (May 8, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission

may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was discriminated against on

the basis of age (D.O.B. 6/25/43) and in reprisal for prior EEO activity

when, since May 2000, he was subjected to a hostile work environment by

his direct supervisor. An EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) held a hearing

and issued a decision finding that complainant did not demonstrate

age-based animus. The AJ further found that complainant failed to

show that management's actions were motivated by retaliatory animus.

The agency's final order adopted the findings of the AJ. On appeal,

the Commission affirmed the agency's final order.

In the instant request, complainant raises no argument or evidence that

was not previously considered in the prior decision. Having considered

the evidence of the record and complainant's submission, we find

that complainant failed to show that the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law or would

have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of

the agency.

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC

Appeal No. 01A20430 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission

on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 10, 2003

__________________

Date