Berbiglia, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Nazareth Regional High School v. N.L.R.B
549 F.2d 873 (2d Cir. 1977) Cited 36 times
Holding that, to rebut a presumption of majority status, "the employer must produce clear and convincing evidence of loss of union support capable of raising a reasonable doubt of the union's continuing majority"
Harvey's Wagon Wheel, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
550 F.2d 1139 (9th Cir. 1976) Cited 35 times
Holding that in camera inspection is not required where no factual dispute exists as to the nature of the statements sought
Russell Stover Candies, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
551 F.2d 204 (8th Cir. 1977) Cited 27 times
Instructing supervisor to engage in systematic surveillance of employee union activity, questioning about results, and encouraging continuance during nonworking hours is unfair labor practice
Orion Corporation v. N.L.R.B
515 F.2d 81 (7th Cir. 1975) Cited 22 times
No. 74-1432. Argued January 15, 1975. Decided April 28, 1975. Walter S. Davis, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne and Roger T. Brice, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CLARK, Associate Justice. and CUMMINGS and TONE, Circuit Judges. Associate Justice Tom C. Clark of the Supreme Court of the United States (Retired) is sitting by designation. PER CURIAM
N.L.R.B. v. Sky Wolf Sales
470 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1972) Cited 23 times
In Sky Wolf Sales, the employer's general manager, two non-union salesmen, and a warehouse foreman had assisted in circulating a decertification proceeding.
Stop Shop Companies, Inc., Etc. v. N.L.R.B
548 F.2d 17 (1st Cir. 1977) Cited 18 times 1 Legal Analyses
Enforcing the Board's conclusion that pharmacy managers were not supervisors even though the managers filled out performance review forms concerning clerks that sometimes played some part in the grant of merit raises
Illinois St. Journal-Register, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
412 F.2d 37 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 21 times
Concluding that the term "employees" in Section 2 is to be interpreted by reference to Section 2
Steves Sash Door Company v. N.L.R.B
401 F.2d 676 (5th Cir. 1968) Cited 11 times
No. 24767. October 3, 1968. Theodore F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Richard S. Rodin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: Steves Sash Door Company petitions this Court pursuant to Section 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., to review and set aside an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board. The Board
United Transp. Union, Local 1699 v. N.L.R.B
546 F.2d 1038 (D.C. Cir. 1976) Cited 1 times
No. 75-1561. Argued September 20, 1976. Decided December 9, 1976. Edward D. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bert Bisgyer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. John H. Leddy, Philadelphia, Pa., with whom Warren W. Woods, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for intervenor. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,094 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Berbiglia, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Holding that, to rebut a presumption of majority status, "the employer must produce clear and convincing evidence of loss of union support capable of raising a reasonable doubt of the union's continuing majority"

Holding that in camera inspection is not required where no factual dispute exists as to the nature of the statements sought

Instructing supervisor to engage in systematic surveillance of employee union activity, questioning about results, and encouraging continuance during nonworking hours is unfair labor practice

In Sky Wolf Sales, the employer's general manager, two non-union salesmen, and a warehouse foreman had assisted in circulating a decertification proceeding.

Enforcing the Board's conclusion that pharmacy managers were not supervisors even though the managers filled out performance review forms concerning clerks that sometimes played some part in the grant of merit raises

Concluding that the term "employees" in Section 2 is to be interpreted by reference to Section 2

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"